OII Backgrounder: Homeowners insurance outlook
(9/04)
Less than profitable insurance line for past decade
Insurers
across the country and in Ohio have been providing homeowners
coverage at a loss for several years. An industry
combined ratio of over 100 means that more was paid out
in claims and expenses than was collected; a ratio below
100 means that more was collected than paid out. (The
combined ratio is the percentage of each premium dollar a
property/casualty
insurer spends on claims and expenses such as business
overhead. A combined ratio above 100% means the insurer
is losing money on that line of business. A combined
ratio of 105%, for example, means that $1.05 was paid in
claims
and expenses for every dollar of premium earned.).
Losses in the homeowners insurance line between 2000–2003
are estimated at $17 billion, according to figures released
by the Insurance Information Institute (III). This rivals
the $20.3 billion in insured property losses from the 9/11
Terrorist Attack. In 2001, US homeowners insurers paid out
$7.3 billion more than they collected in premiums, making
it the second worst year on record. In 2002, insurers paid
out $3.5 billion more in losses and expenses than received
in premiums. 1992 was the worst year on record, with $11.5
billion more paid in losses than in premiums collected.
Ohio insurers did not profit from this line between 1993–2002,
according the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) “Profitability by Line by State” report
published in December 2003. The NAIC study finds that the
Ohio homeowners insurance market has operated at a greater
loss ratio than the US average since 1996. For example, for
every dollar collected in homeowners insurance premiums in
2002, Ohio insurers paid out nearly $1.19; while the national
average was $1.06 for every $1.00 collected in premiums.
See Table 1 below for Ohio and US Profitability for Homeowners
Insurance, 1993-2002.
TABLE 1: Ohio and US profitability for homeowners insurance,
1993-2002
|
Year
|
Average US
Profitability for Homeowners*
|
Average Ohio Profitability for Homeowners*
|
|
1993
|
$1.10
|
$1.04
|
|
1994
|
1.12
|
1.13
|
|
1995
|
1.08
|
1.02
|
|
1996
|
1.17
|
1.23
|
|
1997
|
.97
|
1.08
|
|
1998
|
1.06
|
1.08
|
|
1999
|
1.05
|
1.15
|
|
2000
|
1.08
|
1.21
|
|
2001
|
1.19
|
1.28
|
|
2002
|
1.06
|
1.19
|
|
Average 1993-2002
|
$1.09
|
$1.14
|
* For every dollar collected in homeowners premiums, the
amount shown was paid out that year
Sources: National Association of Insurance Commissioners “Profitability
by Line by State in 2002,” December 2003 and “Profitability
by Line by State in 2001,” December 2002
US and Ohio 2004 premium forecast
According to a June 2004 report from the Insurance Information
Institute (III), the cost of insuring a home in 2004 is expected
to rise by about 2.8%, the smallest increase in five years.
The projected increase represents a substantial slowdown
from 2003 when homeowners insurance costs rose by an estimated
7.4%.
NOTE: The III 2004 homeowners report is online at: www.iii.org/media/updates/press.736740/
As of May 20, 2004 the Ohio Department of Insurance reports
a 2.9% increase filed by Ohio’s top 10 homeowners insurance
writers, representing about 70% of the homeowners insurance
market. This is substantially lower than the 10.3% increase
reported by these companies for 2003. The Ohio Insurance
Institute estimates Ohio’s 2004 average homeowners
premium to be about $480, a $14 increase from 2003.
Ohio and
US homeowners premiums: 1995–2004
Despite the fact that
Ohio insurers have been losing money on the homeowners line
for years, NAIC’s homeowners
premium studies (“Dwelling Fire, Homeowners Owner-Occupied,
and Homeowners Tenant and Condominium/Cooperative Unit
Owner’s Insurance” studies) show that Ohioans
pay significantly lower homeowners insurance premiums than
the US average. The NAIC study looks at homeowners premium
data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. See
Table 2 for average homeowners insurance premiums for 1995–2001
and Ohio and US projections through 2004.
TABLE 2: Average homeowners insurance premiums in Ohio
and US 1995–2001
and projections 2002–2004
|
Year
|
US average
homeowners
ins. premium
|
Ohio average homeowners
ins. premium
|
OH Ranking (compared to other states, including
DC)
|
|
1995
|
$418
|
$268
|
49th lowest
|
|
1996
|
440
|
279
|
50th lowest
|
|
1997
|
455
|
289
|
50th lowest
|
|
1998
|
481
|
303
|
50th lowest
|
|
1999
|
488
|
314
|
50th lowest
|
| 2000 |
508 |
334 |
48th lowest |
| 2001 |
536 |
359 |
47th lowest |
|
Homeowners
Ins. Estimates
|
US
|
Ohio
|
|
|
2002
|
559*
|
423**
|
*Estimated increase of 4.2% in US
**17.8% in OH based on top 10 writers with 70.1% market
share
|
|
2003*
|
600*
|
466**
|
*Based on 7.4% estimated increase in US
**10.3% in OH based on top 10 writers with 70.1% market
share
|
|
2004*
|
617*
|
480**
|
*Based on 2.8% projected increase in US
**2.9% in OH based on top 10 writers with 70.1% market
share
|
Sources: 1995–2001 US and Ohio data: Dwelling Fire,
Homeowners Owner-Occupied, and Homeowners Tenant and Condominium/Cooperative
Unit Owner’s Insurance, published by the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners 1996-2004; Table 4 in all reports.
Based on the HO-3 homeowner package policy for owner-occupied
dwellings, 1-4 family units. Provides “all risks” coverage
(except those specifically excluded in the policy) on buildings,
broad named-peril coverage on personal property, and is the
most common package written.
Note: Average Premium = Premiums/Exposure per House-Years.
A House-Year is equal to 365 days of insured coverage for
a single dwelling.
2002–2004 estimates: Insurance Information
Institute estimates based on data from the National Association
Insurance
Commissioners (Revised 9/04 based on NAIC actuals for 2001.)
2002–2004 Ohio estimates: Ohio Insurance
Institute estimates based on data from the Ohio Department
of Insurance
(Revised 9/04 based on NAIC actuals for 2001.)
Ohio’s homeowners insurance premium increase averaged
17.8% in 2002, based on Ohio Department of Insurance data
for the top 10 homeowners insurance writers. This translates
to about $64. The 2003 premium increase translates to about
$43. Ohio consumers can expect about a $14 increase in 2004
based rate filings with the Ohio Department of Insurance
as of May 20, 2004.
Factors affecting homeowners insurance premiums
- Higher than
normal catastrophe frequency and severity: Between 1993-2003
insurers paid out more than $106 billion
in catastrophe-related
losses—about $700 million per month, excluding
the impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack.
In 2003
catastrophe losses from 21 natural disasters reached
nearly $12.9 billion, according to Property Claim Services
(PCS),
up 120% from 2002 year-end totals. PCS reports Ohio catastrophe
claims for 2003 at $320 million, up from $257 million
in 2002.
Although it’s difficult to project exactly how catastrophe
losses affect premiums from one year to the next, part of
future premiums are based on an insurer’s past loss
exposure from storms and other types of homeowners losses
over a period of time. It’s important to note that
each company’s loss exposure varies by the type
and location of the storm, and the number of policyholders
affected.
Ohio catastrophes in recent years include:
– A series of May 2004 storms affected parts
of the Buckeye state and produced at least $167 million
in insured
losses. The most prominent storms hit the Canton area (May 17), Newark
and northeast Ohio (May 21), and the greater Dayton
area (May 26-27). (www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/newsroom_full.asp?id=204)
– Easter Sunday Central Ohio hailstorm (April
20, 2003) resulted in at least $241 million in insured
losses
from 38,219
claims (updated May 2004).
– February 2003 snow and ice storms across Ohio
caused at least $17.5 million in losses. (www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/news03-11-03.asp)
– The November 10, 2002 series of tornadoes
and storms across the Buckeye stat caused at least $91.6 million in insured
losses. The storm front set off multiple
tornadoes, including
an
F-4 tornado
packing winds over 200 mph in Van Wert and
hail, rain and damaging winds in other parts
of the
state.
(www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/news11-18-02.asp)
– At least $40 million in claims associated
w/tornado and severe weather moving through the state
on April 28, 2002.
(www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/news05-14-02.asp)
– A hailstorm in the Dayton-Kettering area on
April 9, 2001 caused at least $70 million in insured
losses.
(www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/news06-13-01.asp)
– Insured losses from the September 20, 2000
Xenia tornado were about $45 million, according
to Property Claim Services
– January 1999 winters storms: Snow, ice, freezing
rain and high winds combined forces throughout the Buckeye
State
in a series of January 1999 winter storms
that caused over $41 million in insured
losses from at least 26,000 claims.
– An F-4 tornado that ripped through the Cincinnati
area on April 9, 1999 caused at least $66 million in insured
losses.
(www.ohioinsurance.org/newsroom/news4-16a-99.asp)
– Blizzard of '96: This dual winter storm system
first hit the second week of January 1996, followed
by more snow,
ice and strong winds during the third week of January. OII estimates
that insured losses
from
these
two
storms topped
$46.2 million in the Buckeye
State, with at least 28,500 claims being filed.
-
Cost of construction: On average, home construction
costs in Ohio rose 10.4% between 1998–2003. A residential
home built in Ohio in 1998
for $100,000 cost $110,400
to build
in 2003.
-
Growth in home repair and improvements and related
costs: According to the US Department of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, the cost of household item
repair rose 22.9% between
1998–2002.
According to a February 2003 report by
Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies
(JCHS), about 41 million homeowners added
to or improved their homes between 2001–02.
Remodeling expenditure totals, which includes
home and rental
property maintenance and repair, and home and
rental property improvements
were estimated at $214 billion in 2001. An estimated
$125 billion was spent on home improvements between
second quarter
2003 and first quarter 2004, according to an
April 2004 JCHS release.
-
Home values are on the
rise. The National Association of Homebuilders
estimates the average price of a US existing
home in 2004 to be $224,000, up 27% since 2000. The average
price of an existing home in 2000 was $176,200.
-
The emergence
of mold claims that were virtually unheard of just
a few years ago cost insurers $2.3 billion
in Texas alone in 2002, according to Texas Department
of Insurance figures. This is twice as much as the year
before.
- Increase water-related claims costs. Companies
continually look for ways to protect property against
the rising costs
associated with tornadoes, hurricanes, heavy rains and
hailstorms without sacrificing coverage. Some companies
are investigating
higher deductibles for such claims, while others consider
limiting the amount on such claims, assessing losses
at actual cash value rather than replacement cost and
other such adjustments.
According to Insurance Services
Office, Inc. (ISO), while water damage and freezing
claims frequency slowed for 2002,
(1.85 per 100 policies), the average amount paid for
such claims rose 20% between 1998–2002 to $3,098
in 2002.
Wind/hail and water damage/freezing claims accounted
for about 42.6% of US homeowners and 50.4% of Ohio’s
homeowners claims in 2002, reports ISO.
Ohio’s competitive homeowners market
According to A.M.
Best data for 2002, only three states, Florida, Pennsylvania
and Illinois, have more homeowners
insurance providers than Ohio. In 2002, there were 289
companies licensed to write homeowners insurance in the
Buckeye state. Ohio’s total homeowners premium volume
ranks eighth in the nation. Competition among insurers
provides an affordable homeowners insurance market for
consumers.
Also see:
|